<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Light and Shade II &#187; News comment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nbrphoto.net/blog/category/news-comment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nbrphoto.net/blog</link>
	<description>The new, improved blog from nbrphoto</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:13:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Zeiss lenses for Canon?</title>
		<link>http://nbrphoto.net/blog/2008/09/zeiss-lenses-for-canon/</link>
		<comments>http://nbrphoto.net/blog/2008/09/zeiss-lenses-for-canon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News comment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbrphoto.net/blog/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Zeiss themselves, &#8220;ZE&#8221; lenses are coming. Now I assume that&#8217;s not a reference to Mamiya&#8217;s ZE range of 35mm SLRs, nor to the Olympus flavour of Four Turds, but to Canon&#8217;s EF mount. If so, it should open up choice a little more for Canon users, particularly for ultrawides.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://www.zeiss.com/photo">Zeiss themselves</a>, &#8220;ZE&#8221; lenses are coming. Now I assume that&#8217;s not a reference to Mamiya&#8217;s ZE range of 35mm SLRs, nor to the Olympus flavour of Four Turds, but to Canon&#8217;s EF mount. If so, it should open up choice a little more for Canon users, particularly for ultrawides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nbrphoto.net/blog/2008/09/zeiss-lenses-for-canon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon&#8217;s D90 and video</title>
		<link>http://nbrphoto.net/blog/2008/08/nikons-d90-and-video/</link>
		<comments>http://nbrphoto.net/blog/2008/08/nikons-d90-and-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News comment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbrphoto.net/blog/?p=165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the D90 is to have some video capability. I would love to be old-fashioned and scathing about such a facility &#8211; except it&#8217;s the way the world is going, with multimedia at the heart of newsgathering. Oh, and I would quite like the feature myself, sometimes. I certainly find I shoot more small bursts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the D90 is to have some video capability. I would love to be old-fashioned and scathing about such a facility &#8211; except it&#8217;s the way the world is going, with multimedia at the heart of newsgathering. Oh, and I would quite like the feature myself, sometimes. I certainly find I shoot more small bursts of video on compacts now than I used to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nbrphoto.net/blog/2008/08/nikons-d90-and-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon announces the 50D&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://nbrphoto.net/blog/2008/08/canon-announces-the-50d/</link>
		<comments>http://nbrphoto.net/blog/2008/08/canon-announces-the-50d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gear talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News comment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbrphoto.net/blog/?p=158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;and some people seem to be disappointed. Beats me why &#8211; of course the proof of the pudding and all that, but on paper, it looks great.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and some people seem to be disappointed. Beats me why &#8211; of course the proof of the pudding and all that, but on paper, it looks great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nbrphoto.net/blog/2008/08/canon-announces-the-50d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympic camera ban&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://nbrphoto.net/blog/2008/08/olympic-camera-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://nbrphoto.net/blog/2008/08/olympic-camera-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 09:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News comment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbrphoto.net/blog/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Amateur Photographer, the organisers of the Beijing (that&#8217;s Peking, for us oldies) Olympics have banned &#8220;professional&#8221; camera gear from the stadia on the highly spurious grounds that such equipment blocks the view of other spectators. Oh yeah? Pull the other one, it&#8217;s got bells on. I&#8217;ve never heard such a load of old [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Olympics_bans_professional_cameras_news_264889.html">Amateur Photographer</a>, the organisers of the Beijing (that&#8217;s Peking, for us oldies) Olympics have banned &#8220;professional&#8221; camera gear from the stadia on the highly spurious grounds that such equipment blocks the view of other spectators. Oh yeah? Pull the other one, it&#8217;s got bells on. I&#8217;ve never heard such a load of old bollocks in my life. I suspect what they&#8217;re <em>really</em> worried about is that someone might get pics that don&#8217;t show the whole thing in the &#8220;right&#8221; light, or may get some pics of any possible protests.</p>
<p>Now, when do we get an Olympus camera ban? That would make a lot more sense! <img src='http://nbrphoto.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nbrphoto.net/blog/2008/08/olympic-camera-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leica to be bought by Canon?</title>
		<link>http://nbrphoto.net/blog/2006/01/leica-to-be-bought-by-canon/</link>
		<comments>http://nbrphoto.net/blog/2006/01/leica-to-be-bought-by-canon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 01:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News comment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbrphoto.net/blog/2006/01/leica-to-be-bought-by-canon/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the rumours say &#8211; not entirely sure what it would mean for the future of Leica.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the rumours say &#8211; not entirely sure what it would mean for the future of Leica.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nbrphoto.net/blog/2006/01/leica-to-be-bought-by-canon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
